Maintain your record of processing, review a data flow register seeded from the integrations you've already connected, track data subject requests against a statutory clock, and turn a DPIA into a real, linked entry in your risk register — all in the same workspace as the rest of your compliance program.
Maintain an Article 30 register: name, controller-or-processor role, purpose, lawful basis, data categories, retention, and recipients per activity.
Track where personal data moves between systems, the data categories involved, lawful basis, and whether a transfer crosses a border, with a safeguard noted.
Draft data flow entries are proposed from the integrations you've already connected, so you start from what's actually wired up, not a blank form. You review and explicitly accept each one — this is not automated discovery of what data those systems actually move.
Log access, deletion, portability, and opt-out requests with the subject's email, received date, and an assignee.
Every DSR gets a due date under the GDPR Art. 12(3) one-month clock, with due-soon and overdue states so nothing quietly lapses.
Capture the processing description, necessity and proportionality justification, risks to individuals, and mitigating measures for a DPIA.
Submitting a DPIA creates a real entry in your risk register at a likelihood/impact derived from the residual risk level you assess (low, medium, or high) — DPIAs live on the same 5x5 heat grid as every other risk, not in a separate database.
Associate a DPIA with the processing activity it assesses, so the assessment and the record it's about stay connected.
RoPA, data flows, DSRs, and DPIA-linked risks sit alongside your controls and evidence, so privacy work isn't a silo the rest of the platform can't see.
Step 1
Log each processing activity with its purpose, lawful basis, data categories, and retention, building your Article 30 record as you go.
Step 2
See draft data flow entries proposed from your connected integrations, and accept, edit, or dismiss each one — nothing is added without your review.
Step 3
Record each data subject request on intake and watch it against a 30-day SLA clock, with due-soon and overdue states visible at a glance.
Step 4
Document processing, necessity, risks to individuals, and mitigations, then submit it — the assessment becomes a linked entry in your risk register at the residual risk level you set.
Step 5
Update processing activities, flows, and DSR statuses as your data map and third parties change, instead of a document that goes stale.
Article 30, kept current
GDPR requires most organizations to keep a record of their processing activities. Rather than a document someone updates twice a year, each activity — purpose, lawful basis, data categories, retention, recipients, and whether you're the controller or a processor — lives as a row you can add to and edit as your processing actually changes.
Start from what's connected, not a blank sheet
Mapping where personal data moves is normally the hardest part of a privacy program to start. Draft data flow entries are proposed from the integrations you've already connected in GRC Oversight, so you begin from your actual system inventory. Each suggestion is explicit and reviewer-driven: you accept, edit, or dismiss it — the platform does not infer what fields a connector syncs or auto-populate flows without your say-so.
The clock that matters most
A data subject request has a legal clock attached to it. Every request you log gets a due date under the GDPR Article 12(3) one-month standard, and the register surfaces which requests are on track, due soon, or overdue, so a request doesn't get missed because it was sitting in someone's inbox.
One risk model, not two
A DPIA that identifies a risk is supposed to result in a decision about that risk, not a document that sits apart from how you actually manage risk. Submitting a DPIA here creates an entry in your existing risk register — same register, same heat grid — scored from the residual risk level you assess, with the DPIA's narrative (processing description, necessity justification, risks to individuals, mitigations) attached to it. There's no separate DPIA database to keep in sync with the risk register; the DPIA is the risk.
Stand up a real record of processing activities instead of a spreadsheet someone updates once a year.
Start your data flow register from the integrations you've already connected instead of interviewing every team from scratch.
Log the request, track it against the 30-day clock, and hand off with an assignee and notes attached.
Run a DPIA before launching new processing that's likely to result in high risk to individuals, and get a linked risk entry out of it.
Show a regulator or an enterprise customer a current RoPA, a reviewed data flow register, and a DSR log with SLA tracking.
Avoid a parallel privacy risk register — DPIA-derived risks sit in the same register your security and compliance risks already live in.
Capability and direction, built honestly, proven by your own evidence as deployments land.
The product choices that matter when this workflow becomes part of your audit engine.
Data flow drafts start from integrations you've already connected in the platform, so mapping doesn't begin from a blank form — though you still confirm every field.
Nothing from the integration inventory is recorded as a data flow until you explicitly accept it. No silent auto-population.
DSRs carry an actual due date under the GDPR Art. 12(3) standard, with urgency states instead of a manual tickler.
DPIAs create real Risk entries scored on the same heat grid as the rest of your program, so privacy risk isn't tracked apart from everything else.
No. It proposes draft entries from the integrations you've already connected in GRC Oversight (e.g. "your organization → Google Workspace"), flagged for you to review. You explicitly accept, edit, or dismiss each suggestion and fill in the real data categories and lawful basis — it does not inspect or auto-detect what personal data a connector actually syncs.
No. A submitted DPIA is created as an entry in your existing Risk register, tagged as a DPIA, with the residual risk level you select setting its likelihood and impact score. The DPIA's narrative (processing description, necessity, risks, mitigations) is attached to that risk. This keeps DPIAs and risk management as one source of truth instead of two registers that can drift apart.
Each data subject request gets a due date 30 days from when it was received, following the GDPR Article 12(3) one-month standard. You can also set a custom due date if a different deadline applies. The register shows due-soon and overdue states so requests don't lapse unnoticed.
Yes. A DPIA can reference the processing activity it assesses, so the assessment stays connected to the record of processing it's about.
No. This tracks the operational record-keeping and workflow GDPR expects (RoPA, data flows, DSR handling, DPIAs) — it doesn't provide legal determinations about lawful basis, applicability, or whether a specific DPIA is required.
Get a guided demo, or start by scanning any domain for free.