Scale compliance without scaling headcount
You've passed your first audit and now the asks are multiplying: more frameworks, more vendors, more access reviews. Keep it manageable on one evidence graph instead of bolting on point tools.
What changes as you grow
More frameworks, overlapping work
SOC 2 was just the start. Now ISO 27001, HIPAA, or GDPR are on the roadmap, and managing them separately means doing the same control three times.
Vendor risk is piling up
Every new tool is a new third party. Spreadsheets of vendor reviews fall out of date the moment you save them.
Access reviews became real work
With more people and more systems, periodic access reviews go from a quick check to a recurring, evidence-heavy chore.
Questionnaires arrive constantly
As deals get bigger, security reviews get longer and more frequent, and they all want slightly different answers.
Ownership is spread across teams
Controls now live with different owners. Without clear assignment and status, things quietly slip.
Staying ready is the hard part
Passing once isn't the problem anymore; proving you're continuously in control across everything is.
How we solve it, step by step
Consolidate the sprawl onto one system before it owns your week.
Add frameworks on top of what you have
Cross-mapping reuses your existing controls and evidence, so each new framework surfaces only the new requirements.
Bring vendor risk into the platform
Track third parties, send and store assessments, and keep a living view of vendor risk instead of stale spreadsheets.
Automate recurring access reviews
Schedule access reviews, route them to the right owners, and capture sign-off as evidence automatically.
Assign ownership and track status
Every control has an owner and a clear state, so nothing depends on one person remembering it.
Speed up every security review
A growing answer library and your live evidence turn each questionnaire into edits, not a from-scratch effort.
Monitor everything continuously
Drift across frameworks, vendors, and access is flagged as it happens, so readiness is the default state.
Everything you need at this stage
Multi-framework management
Run several frameworks at once with shared controls and cross-mapping.
Vendor / third-party risk
Centralize vendor assessments and keep a current view of third-party risk.
Scheduled access reviews
Automate periodic reviews with owner routing and captured sign-off.
Questionnaire automation
Reusable answer library backed by live evidence for faster reviews.
Owners and accountability
Clear control ownership and status across teams and tools.
Program reporting
Roll-up reporting across frameworks for leadership and auditors.
One program that grows with you
One evidence graph, reused across frameworks, so the work you do now keeps paying off as you grow.
- Add new frameworks by reusing existing evidence, not repeating it.
- Vendor risk and access reviews managed in one place, not spreadsheets.
- Clear ownership and status so nothing slips between teams.
- Faster security reviews from a reusable answer library.
- Continuous monitoring keeps you ready across everything at once.
Questions teams like yours ask
Much easier than the first one. Cross-mapping reuses overlapping controls and evidence, so you focus on the requirements that are new to ISO 27001.
Yes. You can track vendors, run and store assessments, and maintain a living view of third-party risk inside the platform.
As you add people and systems, manual reviews become error-prone and time-consuming. Scheduling them with owner routing and captured sign-off keeps them reliable and audit-ready.
That's the core design. One evidence graph underpins every framework, so you manage a single program rather than parallel ones.
Ready to prove trust continuously?
Get a guided demo, or start by scanning any domain for free.