GRC Oversight

Centralize GRC without slowing teams down

Run multiple frameworks across business units on a single evidence graph, with role-based access, vendor and access-review programs, and reporting auditors trust.

Multiple business unitsMany frameworks in parallelDedicated GRC / security teamAuditors and regulators to satisfy
The challenge

What complicates enterprise GRC

Many frameworks at once

You maintain several frameworks with heavy overlap, and managing them in separate tools multiplies duplicate work across teams.

Distributed ownership

Controls and evidence live across many teams, tools, and regions, making a single source of truth hard.

Third-party sprawl

Hundreds of vendors and integrations create third-party risk that grows faster than any team can review by hand.

Access reviews at scale

Periodic access certifications across dozens of systems and thousands of identities become a major recurring program.

Reporting up and out

Executives, the board, auditors, and regulators all want different views, and they need them backed by live data, not stale exports.

Consistency and control

Standards must be enforced consistently across business units without becoming a bottleneck that slows every team down.

The approach

How we solve it, step by step

One evidence graph under everything, with the controls a large org requires.

Unify controls across the org

Define controls once and map them to every framework and business unit, so overlapping requirements share the same evidence.

Delegate with role-based access

Give admins, members, and auditors scoped access so teams own their controls without exposing the whole program.

Run vendor risk as a program

Centralize third-party assessments, tiering, and ongoing monitoring so vendor risk is managed continuously, not annually.

Operationalize access reviews

Schedule certifications across systems, route them to owners, and capture sign-off as durable evidence at scale.

Report from live data

Generate executive, board, auditor, and regulator views from current control state, with no manual spreadsheet assembly.

Scale without re-platforming

Add frameworks, units, and regions on the same graph, so growth doesn't mean another migration.

What you get

Enterprise-grade capabilities

Cross-framework mapping

Collect evidence once and satisfy many frameworks across business units.

Role-based access control

Scoped roles for admins, members, and auditors across the organization.

Vendor risk program

Third-party assessment, tiering, and continuous monitoring in one place.

Access review automation

Scheduled certifications with owner routing and captured sign-off at scale.

Executive & audit reporting

Live, audit-ready reporting for leadership, the board, and assessors.

Continuous monitoring

Drift detection across frameworks, vendors, and access, organization-wide.

SSO (OIDC) + SCIM provisioning

Centralize sign-on through your identity provider and let SCIM handle user and group lifecycle automatically, no manual account admin.

The outcome

One source of truth across the org

One evidence graph, reused across frameworks, so the work you do now keeps paying off as you grow.

  • Cross-framework control mapping so evidence is collected once.
  • Role-based access for admins, members, and auditors.
  • Vendor risk and scheduled access reviews in one place.
  • Executive and audit-ready reporting from live data.
  • A single evidence graph that scales across business units.
  • SSO (OIDC) + SCIM provisioning, with deprovisioning captured as access-review evidence.
Capability and direction, not a certification claim.
FAQ

Questions teams like yours ask

Yes. Units can own their own frameworks and controls while sharing common evidence through cross-mapping, all on one graph.

Role-based access lets you give admins, members, and auditors precisely the access they need without exposing the entire program.

No. Executive, board, auditor, and regulator views are generated from live control state rather than exported spreadsheets.

No. New frameworks, business units, and regions are added onto the same evidence graph, so growth doesn't mean re-platforming.

Yes. Organizations on a plan with the SSO entitlement can connect an OIDC identity provider for single sign-on and use SCIM 2.0 for automatic user and group provisioning. When your identity provider deprovisions someone, we deactivate them here too and record it as access-review evidence, a genuine SOC 2 CC6 win.

Ready to prove trust continuously?

Get a guided demo, or start by scanning any domain for free.