GRC Oversight

Make user access reviews routine, not painful

Schedule access-review campaigns, pull together who has access to what across your systems, give managers a simple approve-or-revoke interface they'll actually finish, track revocations to completion, and export the signed history as audit-ready evidence.

Capabilities

What it does

Scheduled campaigns

Run quarterly or custom access-review cycles automatically, with reminders that keep them moving.

Access visibility

Pull together who has access to what across your connected systems for each reviewer.

Manager review

A simple approve-or-revoke interface per user, with the context reviewers need to decide.

Scoped campaigns

Scope reviews by system, team, or sensitivity so each reviewer sees only what's theirs.

Signed decisions

Capture each decision with reviewer, timestamp, and notes: a record, not a vague recollection.

Revocation follow-through

Track revoke decisions to completion, confirming the access itself changes rather than only the record of it.

Campaign progress

See completion status across reviewers and chase only the stragglers, not everyone.

Audit-ready export

Export the full signed review history, mapped to the access controls it satisfies.

Reviewer reminders

Automated nudges keep reviewers on track so campaigns close on time.

How it works

From setup to proof

Step 1

Schedule the campaign

Kick off quarterly or custom access-review cycles on a schedule, with reminders so they don't stall mid-campaign.

Step 2

Surface who has access

Pull together who can reach what across your connected systems, so reviewers see real access, not a guess.

Step 3

Approve or revoke

Give managers a simple per-user interface with the context to decide, so reviews actually get completed.

Step 4

Drive revocations to done

Track every revoke decision through to completion, because the evidence is the access actually being removed, not the click that requested it.

Step 5

Export the evidence

Capture signed, timestamped decisions and export the full history mapped to your access controls for the auditor.

In depth

Reviews managers actually finish

Real access, not a spreadsheet

Show reviewers what people can actually reach

Access reviews fail when reviewers are handed a stale export and asked to recognize names. Pulling together real access from connected systems, scoped to what each reviewer owns, means decisions are made against current reality, with the context to tell an appropriate grant from one that should be revoked.

  • Aggregate who has access to what from connected systems.
  • Scope each reviewer to only the access that's theirs.
  • Give reviewers the context to make a real decision.
  • Base the review on current access, not a months-old snapshot.

Completion, not clicks

Decisions tracked through to revocation

A 'revoke' that never happens is a finding waiting to surface. Each decision is captured with the reviewer, timestamp, and notes, and revoke decisions are tracked to completion, so the control is satisfied by access that actually changed, not by an intention recorded in a tool.

  • Every decision signed with reviewer, timestamp, and notes.
  • Revoke decisions tracked to completion, not just to a click.
  • Campaign progress shows who's done and who's outstanding.
  • Automated reminders close campaigns on time.

Evidence by default

An export the auditor accepts

Because the whole campaign is structured and signed as it runs, the evidence is a byproduct, not a separate project. Export the full signed history, mapped to the access controls it satisfies, and hand auditors a clean record of who reviewed what, when, and what changed as a result.

  • Export the full signed, timestamped review history.
  • History maps to the access controls it satisfies.
  • Shows reviewer, decision, and the resulting change.
  • No reconstruction; evidence is captured as the campaign runs.
Use cases

For the control everyone puts off

Satisfying the control

Meet the periodic access-review requirement in SOC 2, ISO 27001, and similar frameworks with evidence to match.

Quarterly reviews

Run reviews on a schedule with reminders so the quarterly cycle stops being a fire drill.

Manager-driven reviews

Let the managers who know their teams make the calls, with an interface simple enough that they finish.

Privileged access

Scope a tighter, more frequent review for sensitive or privileged access specifically.

Closing the loop

Confirm that revoke decisions result in access that's actually removed, not just noted for later.

Audit hand-off

Hand auditors a signed, control-mapped review history instead of reconstructing it from emails.

Outcomes

Reviews that satisfy the control and the auditor

Capability and direction, built honestly, proven by your own evidence as deployments land.

  • Access reviews that run on schedule without manual chasing.
  • Reviewers seeing real, scoped access from your connected systems.
  • A clear interface that managers actually complete.
  • Revoke decisions tracked through to removed access.
  • Signed, timestamped, control-mapped evidence ready to export.
Why teams choose us

Access reviews that close the loop

The product choices that matter when this workflow becomes part of your audit engine.

Decisions that finish

Revoke decisions are tracked to completion, so the control is satisfied by access that actually changed, not by a click in a tool.

Real access, scoped

Reviewers see current access pulled from connected systems, scoped to what's theirs, so reviews aren't guesswork against a stale export.

Evidence as a byproduct

Signed, timestamped decisions are captured as the campaign runs, so audit evidence is an export rather than a reconstruction.

Built to be completed

A simple per-user interface plus automated reminders means campaigns actually close: the hardest part of any review.

FAQ

Questions, answered

How often can reviews run?

On whatever cadence you need. Quarterly is common, but campaigns can be scheduled on a custom cycle, with automated reminders to keep reviewers on track.

How do reviewers know who has access?

The platform pulls together who has access to what from your connected systems and scopes it to each reviewer, so decisions are made against current, real access rather than a stale export.

What happens after a manager clicks revoke?

The revoke decision is tracked to completion, not just recorded. The control is only satisfied when access has actually changed, so the loop is closed rather than left as an intention.

Is the result audit-ready?

Yes. Every decision is signed with the reviewer, timestamp, and notes, and the full history exports mapped to the access controls it satisfies, ready to hand to an auditor.

Can we scope a campaign to specific systems or teams?

Yes. Campaigns can be scoped by system, team, or sensitivity, so each reviewer only sees the access that's theirs and privileged access can get a tighter review.

Get started

Ready to prove trust continuously?

Get a guided demo, or start by scanning any domain for free.